Science for Imagination

Science is a wonderful thing. It has taught me a lot. I appreciate its capabilities. It provides some kind of a stimulus to me to think beyond what it has already taught me. It pushes me to imagine and be rational at the same time.
Thats what I call a balancing act. A tight rope walk. If you successfully reach the other end of the rope then you may end up with a concept worth pondering on. Well, this concept of yours may not be the solution to the problems of the world; just something thats yours. Your intellectual property! Who cares if its all screwed up and weird. Obviously you don't have to present it to the President or anything. The essence of all this lies in training your brain to produce. You see, I have seen machines producing extremely complex products like mobiles, cars, computers. They all roll out from the production giving a perfect example of super orchestration. They produce. They produce at a large scale and at a consistent pace. Hmmmm! But they certainly cant produce something beyond what they are programmed to do. Example: A car producing machine, one fine day, is not gonna roll out a Nokia N series for you. Neither is it ever gonna paint a Mona Lisa. Because it knows no definition of imagination, creativity. Its a machine after all.

I just wanna draw your attention to the paradox in the situation. Science, I say, taught me to imagine, to produce something beyond the capacity of a machine; a machine is again something that symbolises "science" to some extent at least.